Fer_ananda spores

Thomas Jefferson and George Washington recorded daily weather observations, but they didn’t record them hourly or by the minute. Not only did they have other things to do, such data didn’t seem useful. Even after the invention of the telegraph enabled the centralization of weather data, the 150 volunteers who received weather instruments from the Smithsonian Institution in 1849 still reported only once a day. Now there is a literally immeasurable, continuous stream of climate data from satellites circling the earth, buoys bobbing in the ocean, and Wi-Fi-enabled sensors in the rain forest. We are measuring temperatures, rainfall, wind speeds, C02 levels, and pressure pulses of solar wind. All this data and much, much more became worth recording once we could record it, once we could process it with computers, and once we could connect the data streams and the data processors with a network. How will we ever make sense of scientific topics that are too big to know? The short answer: by transforming what it means to know something scientifically.

To Know, but Not Understand: David Weinberger on Science and Big Data - David Weinberger - Technology - The Atlantic (via wildcat2030) Via A Momentary Flow
  1. rhea137 reblogged this from wildcat2030
  2. ferananda reblogged this from wildcat2030
  3. geofaultline reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
  4. darkuncle reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
  5. notational reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
  6. theobjectsofmyaffection reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
  7. oneupweb reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
  8. infoneer-pulse reblogged this from wildcat2030
  9. wildcat2030 posted this
To Tumblr, Love PixelUnion